wheels analyze
Base command for code analysis and quality checks.
Synopsis
Description
The wheels analyze
command provides comprehensive code analysis tools for Wheels applications. It helps identify code quality issues, performance bottlenecks, security vulnerabilities, and provides actionable insights for improvement.
Subcommands
code
Analyze code quality and patterns
performance
Analyze performance characteristics
security
Security vulnerability analysis (deprecated)
Options
--help
Show help information
--version
Show version information
Direct Usage
When called without subcommands, runs all analyses:
This executes:
Code quality analysis
Performance analysis
Security scanning (if not deprecated)
Examples
Run all analyses
Quick analysis with summary
Analyze specific directory
Generate analysis report
Analysis Overview
The analyze command examines:
Code Quality
Coding standards compliance
Code complexity metrics
Duplication detection
Best practices adherence
Performance
N+1 query detection
Slow query identification
Memory usage patterns
Cache effectiveness
Security
SQL injection risks
XSS vulnerabilities
Insecure configurations
Outdated dependencies
Output Example
Analysis Configuration
Configure via .wheels-analysis.json
:
Integration with CI/CD
GitHub Actions Example
Quality Gates
Set minimum scores:
Report Formats
HTML Report
Interactive dashboard
Detailed issue breakdown
Code snippets with issues
JSON Report
Machine-readable format
CI/CD integration
Custom processing
Markdown Report
Documentation-friendly
Pull request comments
Wiki integration
Analysis Rules
Built-in Rules
CFScript best practices
SQL query optimization
Security patterns
Memory management
Custom Rules
Create custom rules in .wheels-analysis-rules/
:
Baseline
Track improvement over time:
Ignoring Issues
Inline Comments
Configuration File
Performance Tips
Incremental Analysis: Analyze only changed files
Parallel Processing: Use multiple cores
Cache Results: Reuse analysis for unchanged files
Focused Scans: Target specific directories
Use Cases
Pre-commit Hooks: Catch issues before commit
Pull Request Checks: Automated code review
Technical Debt: Track and reduce over time
Team Standards: Enforce coding guidelines
Performance Monitoring: Identify bottlenecks
Best Practices
Run analysis regularly
Fix high-priority issues first
Set realistic quality gates
Track metrics over time
Integrate with development workflow
Troubleshooting
Analysis Takes Too Long
Exclude vendor directories
Use incremental mode
Increase memory allocation
Too Many False Positives
Tune rule sensitivity
Add specific ignores
Update rule definitions
Notes
First run may take longer due to initial scanning
Results are cached for performance
Some rules require database connection
Memory usage scales with codebase size
See Also
Last updated
Was this helpful?